Muscle strength can be evaluated in a number of ways: manually , functionally, or mechanically.
The Oxford Scale
The Oxford scale has been devised to manually assess muscle strength and is widely used by physiotherapists. According to the Oxford scale, muscle strength is graded 0 to 5.
Summarises the grades
Grade Muscle contraction
0 No contraction
1 Flicker of a contraction
2 Full-range active movement with gravity eliminated (counterbalanced)
3 Full-range active movement against gravity
4 Full-range active movement against light resistance.
5 Normal function/full range against strong resistance.
There are limitations to the usefulness of the Oxford scale. These include:
• A lack of functional relevance.
difference between grades 4 and 5).
• A patient's variability with time (rarely falling into a fixed category).
• A degree of subjectivity between assessors.
• Assessment of muscles acting only concentrically
Functional Tools
Functional tools can be used to evaluale strength and can be related to a specific activity or to one of its components . These tools are commonly employed when rehabilitating sportsmen back to competition . Sport - specific activities can be monitored by a physiotherapist with knowledge of the demands of a parlicular sport.
Isokinetic Assessment
Isokinetic assessment has been used With increasing frequency since it's inception in the 1970s. IT involves the use of computerized evaluation of movement when exercising at a preset angular velocity on the isokinetic equipment. This means that the subject can push as hard or as little as desired and the machine will move only at the preset velocity . It is therefore the resistance provided by the machine that varies.
Use of isokinetics has functional relevance since it can evaluate both eccentric and concentric activity through range.
Drawbacks
The drawbacks of isokinetics relate to its function , as natural human movements rarely occur at fixed velocities . Also the machine operates on a fixed axis of movement, which does not replicate the instantaneous axis of movement found in most normal joints . The equipment can also be time - consuming to set up and not all physiotherapists will have access to it.
Additional limitations have been acknowledged by Lieber (1992). These include the time required to recruit muscle fibres (50-200 milliseconds) making this period of data obtained unusable. Another drawback is the limb striking the testing bar at the end of the movement, although some isokinetic units employ a damping mechanism to prevent this .